Proceeding contribution from Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 November 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]
My Lords, I wonder whether the noble Lord, Lord Elton, will allow me to give an example of why what he says is not relevant to the Bill. My sister is a lesbian, and she and her partner decided to have a child. Her partner bore the child, with the active agreement of a man friend. My sister has no rights whatever over that child. She had no legal power to become the equivalent of a father. Fortunately, it has worked well, and the child has grown up happy and contented. The effect of the existing law is to take away the equivalent of a father, and the effect of this Bill would be to give my sister rights that would be equivalent to those of a father. It works in the opposite direction from that which the noble Lord, Lord Elton, is describing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 696 c842
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Clones Abortion Breast cancer Cancer Civil partners Fertility Homosexuality Human embryo experiments Diseases Ethics IVF Fathers Northern Ireland Parents Minority groups Medicine Religion Research Stem cells Human-animal hybrid embryos
- Legislation
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:51:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_423422
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_423422
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_423422