Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 November 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]

My Lords, I wonder whether the noble Lord, Lord Elton, will allow me to give an example of why what he says is not relevant to the Bill. My sister is a lesbian, and she and her partner decided to have a child. Her partner bore the child, with the active agreement of a man friend. My sister has no rights whatever over that child. She had no legal power to become the equivalent of a father. Fortunately, it has worked well, and the child has grown up happy and contented. The effect of the existing law is to take away the equivalent of a father, and the effect of this Bill would be to give my sister rights that would be equivalent to those of a father. It works in the opposite direction from that which the noble Lord, Lord Elton, is describing.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
696 c842 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Clones Abortion Breast cancer Cancer Civil partners Fertility Homosexuality Human embryo experiments Diseases Ethics IVF Fathers Northern Ireland Parents Minority groups Medicine Religion Research Stem cells Human-animal hybrid embryos
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk