Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 22 November 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007.


Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007

My Lords, the transfer from NIRS1 to NIRS2 took place in 1998, and that was certainly a key factor in the errors that arose. For the avoidance of doubt, I can say that checking is going on right back to that earlier period. In his presentation the noble Lord asked when NIRS2 was developed. I do not have a precise starting date, but it was clearly developed some time before 1998 because that is when it was actioned. Earlier I did not answer the point about the OGC reviews and the red flags that were given to certain projects. The whole purpose of such reviews is for someone external to come in and look at the teams that are producing change, to check that their systems are up to scratch and that they are doing the testing and putting in all the arrangements that they should in order to deliver on the desired policies. The fact that from time to time there are red, or sometimes orange, flags is entirely consistent with what they are required to do, and is one of the Government’s safeguards.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
696 c1011 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Databases Computers National insurance Pensions Payments National insurance contributions Social security benefits National insurance credits
Legislation
Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk