Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 December 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]

The noble Lord is right that we are talking about two different things, and he has explained it far better than I could. What he is seeking with his amendment, however, goes beyond the research that is currently covered in the Bill, and it raises deeper questions, not least the question of whether the HFEA itself should be responsible for regulating such research or whether it should be the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. There are bigger questions to be explored, and the Government are suggesting that that happen at a later date. I see the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, looking queryingly at me. I understand his queries; I have perhaps not clarified whether this needs to be primary or secondary legislation. As I said earlier, I believe it has to be primary legislation, but I will come back to noble Lords.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
696 c1637-8 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Abortion Fertility Human embryo experiments Donors Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Ethics IVF NHS Medical treatments Parents Organs Medicine Standards Training Screening Regulation Research Stem cells Christianity
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk