Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].


Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]

I speak as a simple searcher after truth. Let us suppose that, in 2009, £300 million is sent by the various banks to the reclaim fund and the reclaim fund decides, ““Well, we had better be careful about this; we will let £200 million go””. Let us say that 15 per cent of that has to go to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. That leaves £170 million. The Minister says that we had better crack on with this young people stuff, the deprivation of financial knowledge and so on. If the social investment bank needs £250 million, how does he believe that that could possibly happen in those circumstances—unless he takes the view, as I did much earlier, that, like the Irish, the banks and building societies got it all wrong? Is that what he is tugging to?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c498GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Devolved matters Disadvantaged Charities Community development Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Health Education Environment Investment Distribution Northern Ireland Lotteries Scotland Young people Wales Youth services Big Lottery Fund Operating costs
Legislation
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk