Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]

My Lords, is the difficulty of the noble Baroness, Lady Williams, that the embryo has been selected to be a tissue match or would her objections apply equally if a natural-birth second child was found to be a tissue match and there was a wish on the part of the parents—leaving aside the issues of consent for the moment—to ensure that material from the second child, whether bone marrow or whatever, be made available to the first child? Is it the design or the intention that presents her with the greater difficulty, or is it the effect that the second child may indeed turn out to be a tissue match even though it was not so intended?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1274 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Congenital abnormalities Fertility Licensing Human embryo experiments Diseases Donors Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Ethics IVF Organs Relatives Research Testing Stem cells Human Tissue Authority Human-animal hybrid embryos
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk