Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Judd (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Children and Young Persons Bill [HL].


Children and Young Persons Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for his characteristically sympathetic reply on my amendments. I found what he said very encouraging. I shall go away and study it in detail, but it seems to me that what he said meets the anxieties that I expressed. I just make the point—I think that I have already made it this afternoon—that sometimes the use of generic language can leave an area of doubt, and therefore some specificity in what is meant by a term can be helpful. I ask him to think about that. I know that there is a nice balance to be struck, because the argument the other way is that, if we start putting in the detail, something gets left out to which it should apply. I understand that point, but there is a happy medium. I am sure that my noble friend will carry out his undertaking to reflect positively on what has been said and see how far he can meet it. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 39 to 46 not moved.] Clause 9 agreed to. [Amendment No. 47 not moved.] Clause 10 [Review of child’s case before making certain alternative arrangements for accommodation]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c523-4GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Children in care Carers CAFCASS Digital technology Human rights Hearing aids Homelessness Travel Schools Special educational needs Young people Social services Reviews Remand in custody Speech and language therapy Speech and language disorders
Legislation
Children and Young Persons Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk