Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].
Local Transport Bill [HL]
I shall wait to hear what the Minister has to say, because he will probably tell us that the guidance will mean that such consultation will happen. In any case, an integrated transport authority would not be doing its job if it failed to consult the rail manager. More important is the basis on which alternative road and rail schemes are considered. There is a tremendous misbalance between the benefits accruing to railway schemes and those accruing to roads. That has its roots in the methodology that the department use to appraise various schemes. A very pessimistic view is taken of the benefits of rail schemes and a very optimistic view of those applying to road schemes.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c1303-4
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Conditions of employment Contracts Bus services Advertising Competition Grants Local government Planning authorities Pensions Public transport Railways Passenger transport executives Taxis Standards Transport Roads Traffic Commissioners Transport Tribunal Local transport plans
- Legislation
- Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Transport Act 1985
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-12-22 10:18:52 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435052
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435052
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435052