Proceeding contribution from Ian Taylor (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
I have listened to this debate for longer than it would appear by the length of my presence in the Chamber. Since 2004, my colleagues and I have constantly prompted the Government to address this issue. The key to it is Clapham Junction, because of the size of the viaduct going in. Thus, it is not just about the circulation at Waterloo; it is also about investing at Clapham Junction in order properly to give commuter access to the five now-vacated lines.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 470 c1136
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assets Channel tunnel High Speed 1 line Fees and charges High speed trains Railway stations Railways Railway network St Pancras Station Office of Rail Regulation Waterloo Station
- Legislation
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:18:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435926
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435926
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435926