Proceeding contribution from Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
I think that I had better accept it, but it seems to me a peculiar legal fiction to say that the authorities are one or the other, particularly as the noble Lord did not seem clear which they are. Nevertheless, as he says, Leicester—the city in which I was born—is an example of this, but there are also the examples of Bristol and of Bath and North East Somerset, where I now live. I shall withdraw the amendment, but I point out that ““local authority”” is defined for the purposes not only of Part 1 but also of Part 2. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 3 agreed to. Clause 4 [““Relevant function””]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c22-3GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Business Delegated legislation Local government Public appointments Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:35:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436787
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436787
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436787