Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 24: 24: Clause 5, page 3, line 36, at end insert— ““(c) regulatory activities should be carried out on the basis of a risk assessment of the regulated person which should include that person’s propensity to comply with a regulation”” The noble Lord said: Crucial to the Hampton approach to enforcement is the concept that the aim should be to secure compliance rather than to seek prosecution. That activity should be focused on those who are most likely to disregard the law and fail to take remedial measures voluntarily. For this, it is essential that the emphasis of enforcement should be on those assessed as those who are likely to break the law and it seems strange that this key requirement should have been omitted, so this amendment seeks to achieve it. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c44GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Business Delegated legislation Local government Public appointments Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:28:46 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848