Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 1 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Special Educational Needs (Information) Bill.


Special Educational Needs (Information) Bill

Many of us believe that local authorities are in an unacceptably powerful position as the bodies that assess, decide on, pay for and—for the most part, through in-house services—provide the services that SEN children are designated to receive. Given that the Children, Schools and Families Committee—then the Education and Skills Committee—produced a compelling report in summer 2006 that, among other things, recommended a separation between the assessment of need and the funding of provision and that we await the Government’s reply to a follow-up, even more detailed report, does the hon. Gentleman agree that there is something to be said for that separation, so that the in-built conflict of interest is removed?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
471 c595 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Children Disclosure of information Autism Hearing impairment Finance Dyslexia Pupils Schools Special educational needs
Legislation
Special Educational Needs (Information) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk