Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].


Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]

Although my Amendment No. 142 is due for a separate debate, it is covered by this group. In particular, it is extremely analogous to Amendment No. 143, as my noble friend Lord De Mauley has already indicated. I do not want to speak to it at length because, in effect, I spoke on the same point when we debated the earlier clause. Nevertheless, like my noble friend, I think that a degree of independence in the review is required. Whether that should be quite as strong as suggested by the words ““independent judicial person”” in my amendment is a matter for discussion. Perhaps it goes a little too far, but a degree of independence seems to be desirable if this part of the process is to have any point.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c570GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Business Civil proceedings Delegated legislation Direct selling Fixed penalties Fines Local government Ofcom Surveillance Tribunals Telecommunications Regulation Safety Local Better Regulation Office Stop notices Sunset clauses
Legislation
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk