Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister for her response. I am very grateful to the noble Viscount, Lord Colville, for his contribution. The noble Baroness’s answer needs careful analysis but she will appreciate our scepticism. Her reply seems to point out the importance of our forthcoming Amendment No. 193, which, with any luck, we will get to shortly. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 163B to 163D not moved.] Clause 61 agreed to. Clause 62 agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c592GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Business Civil proceedings Delegated legislation Direct selling Fixed penalties Fines Local government Ofcom Surveillance Tribunals Telecommunications Regulation Safety Local Better Regulation Office Stop notices Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:36:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443515
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443515
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443515