Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Keith Simpson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 February 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Health Care (Norfolk).


Health Care (Norfolk)

The issue may be not just about funding but about the whole business of the car parking contracts. I am grateful to my hon. Friend for mentioning the issue. Bed blocking has been much in the news, including the local news. The Eastern Daily Press ran a series of articles showing that there were bed-blocking crises at the Norfolk and Norwich university hospital NHS trust and the Queen Elizabeth hospital in Kings Lynn. St. Michael's hospital, along with others, has offered a safety net. Sadly, however, bed blocking will remain a problem, and it must be addressed. Following recent alerts at the Norfolk and Norwich university hospital NHS trust, the number of beds at St. Michael's hospital was increased from 24 to 26—a clear demonstration of the need for community beds in Aylsham and in the county as a whole. Currently, St. Michael's hospital operates at 80 per cent.-plus capacity, and the effectiveness of the PCT's alternative intermediate care strategy ought to be measurable by specific endpoints that include a significant reduction to below 50 per cent. in admissions to St. Michael's hospital. As yet, the evidence is not available. The PCT and the Aylsham care trust will provide intermediate care. The health campus project is insufficiently developed, and indeed, I do not think that most of us are clear about what the PCT means by a health campus. It has a warm feeling about it, invoking the idea of a multi-disciplined university campus, and it may well be the answer to the area's health care requirements. However, as yet, I have not seen sufficient details, and I suspect that one will have to pay the money up front in order to deliver such a campus and provide the health care that we want. The Aylsham group has also been led to believe that there is a strong bid for the stroke unit to be developed in conjunction with the Norfolk and Norwich university hospital NHS trust, albeit with a greatly reduced number of beds—24 instead of 40. That, once again, may mean pressure on the local community hospitals. Home care has been trialled in west Norfolk, and it must work there, because that part of the county lacks community hospitals. The Minister will be only too well aware if he plots health care centres and community hospitals on a map of Norfolk, that owing to its sheer size, little in the way of a safety net exists to deal with any future health care crisis. Based on the points that I and other people have made, the PCT should at the very least think about postponing its original closure date for St. Michael's hospital. The Minister should at the very least take an interest in the issue, and perhaps consult the PCT on whether it has enough financial resources to deal not only with that change, but with the impact of the Darzi review. I have been examining health care in Norfolk at the micro level, but I wonder whether the Minister might—to use the old music hall expression—show an ankle and give us some indication of the outlines of the Darzi review. We heard some of it when the Prime Minister, being desperate to recover from the non-election, performed like a clapping seal a few months ago, and Lord Darzi had to rush through with some initial ideas. In conclusion, the issue is important for my constituents and for myself, but it is not unique to my constituency. There are major challenges throughout Norfolk, and I should therefore be interested in the Minister's views.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c236-7WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Hospitals Health services NHS Primary care trusts Norfolk Reorganisation
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk