Proceeding contribution from Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
I want to make some progress; I will give way again later. Let me return to the differences between the treaties, and in particular the different natures of the treaties. One treaty was of supreme constitutional significance; the other treaty simply makes modest reforms. One treaty replaced all the past EU treaties with one document; the other is merely an amending treaty. One treaty would, effectively, have given the people a chance to vote on the principle of Britain’s membership of the EU, and the other would give the people a chance to vote on whether they wanted to cut the number of EU Commissioners by a third.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c1791;472 c1789
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- European Union European communities Referendums Parliament Treaties Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:37:31 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452130
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452130
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452130