Proceeding contribution from Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 March 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Climate Change.
Climate Change
Absolutely. The right hon. Gentleman, who has a great deal of experience in this sector, makes a key point. I must also agree with the hon. Member for Northavon (Steve Webb), who speaks for the Liberal Democrats, that the IPCC is, by definition, a lag indicator. If my hon. Friend the Member for Chichester could point to at least one Government who were dissenting from the IPCC report, his remarks would have a little more credibility. Of course, I am not suggesting that there is no scientific dispute. There will never be an end to scientific dispute. As long as there are more than two intellectuals, there will always be a debate on any given subject. It is good that there are sceptics out there questioning the science—no knowledge on this subject is perfect. However, on the basis of a rational assessment of the risks, very few people, and certainly no single Government, would now doubt that the climate change effects being seen all around us are man-made and that we should act to try and prevent the catastrophic effects that will follow if we allow the world temperature to rise rapidly to 2° above pre-industrial levels.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c468WH
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Climate change
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:59:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452568
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452568
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_452568