Proceeding contribution from John Heppell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 7 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill.
Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill
That is the argument that I started with. We cannot have it both ways. If someone says, ““They're already protected and these things are all going to happen automatically anyway, so there'll be no difference for the employee””, there is no great problem with the legislation, so how can it be burdensome and problematic? We cannot have it both ways.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c2037;472 c2035
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Companies Dismissal Mergers Takeovers Private equity
- Legislation
- Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:59:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145