Proceeding contribution from Nigel Evans (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 7 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill.
Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill
That brings me back to a question I asked earlier about whether Lord Jones had been consulted. Clearly the Government have one view, and Digby Jones normally has another view. At least we can have confidence in what he says, because he has been involved in industry for many years. I think that everyone respects his opinions. The CBI, the organisation that he used to head, has said that there is no logic in applying TUPE to private equity transfers, because sufficient protections for employees already exist. I hope the Minister will say something about that. If the legislation already protects workers irrespective of how their company is taken over, why should we introduce legislation that may duplicate what already exists?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c2045;472 c2043
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Companies Dismissal Mergers Takeovers Private equity
- Legislation
- Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:59:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453187
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453187
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453187