Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Statute Law (Repeals) Bill [HL].


Statute Law (Repeals) Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. In answer to the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway, I do not believe that there will be an attempt at consolidation in this Bill. I am grateful particularly to the Front Benches opposite for their welcome to the Bill. I am sorry that the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, is upset by the mention of the gaol to which he referred. I shall ensure that its inclusion in the Bill is carefully looked into to see whether that is appropriate or whether it should be excluded. But I am grateful for his comments. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Henley, for his support. He specifically mentioned the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 and pointed out that it was passed under this Government. I can at least assure him that the East India Company Acts were not passed under a Labour Government. However, Sections 37 and 38 of the 2001 Act—I know he will want to hear the details, even if the House wants to move on—were intended to repeal provisions. They became spent when their respective repeals took effect at Royal Assent on 14 December 2001. So I do not think that that Act and that course can be used to blame this Government. But I congratulate him on a good try.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c146 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Related items
Deposited Paper DEP2008-0922
Thursday, 3 April 2008
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Subjects
Devolved matters Law Local acts Scotland Reform Statute law
Legislation
Statute Law (Repeals) Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk