Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 March 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2008.


Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2008

It would be odd to do something simply to try to reduce the levy. If there are risks in the scheme and the employer is a sponsoring employer with responsibility for that scheme, it is entirely reasonable that the employer should direct their attention to how that scheme can be properly funded. I therefore do not quite follow the noble Lord’s point. I do not believe that it could be argued that the structure of the levy drives sponsoring employers into difficulties. The focus and construction of the levy could encourage schemes to be appropriately funded. That is in part what is happening. I hope that that has dealt with the point that the noble Lord wanted covered and that it has dealt with each of the other points that noble Lords have made.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c47GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Administration Northern Ireland Workplace pensions Pensions Pension funds Pension Protection Fund
Legislation
Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2008
Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2008
Occupational Pension Schemes (Levies) (Amendment) Regulations 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk