Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].


Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]

My Lords, perhaps I may ask the Minister to clarify one point in relation to my noble friend’s amendment. He referred to the support that the Treasury would give to the LBRO. Was that de facto or de jure? Will it actually happen or is it bound to happen by law? Reading the ““Status”” paragraph in Schedule 1, I was struck that it was as close to saying that the LBRO is flying on its own as it could be without those words being used. The paragraph states: "““LBRO is not to be regarded as a servant or agent of the Crown … The property of LBRO is not to be regarded as the property of, or property held on behalf of, the Crown””." I understand that the Government may be forced to stand behind the LBRO but I should like to know whether they are bound to do so by law.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c313 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Devolved matters Business Borrowing Finance Northern Ireland Non-departmental public bodies Scotland Regulation Wales Parliamentary papers Local Better Regulation Office Sunset clauses
Legislation
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk