Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Glenda Jackson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 19 March 2008. It occurred during Opposition day on Post Office Closures.


Post Office Closures

I should like to reassure my right hon. Friend that I have no intention whatever of voting for the Conservative amendment, which comes from a party that when in government had absolutely no compunction in closing post offices, schools, hospitals, mines and heavy industry. However, there is real concern in my constituency about the proposal to close three highly efficient and consistently well-used post offices. I entirely accept that the usage of post offices has changed, but the people who use them most consistently and will be most severely affected if they are closed include the elderly, the disabled and single parents with small children. Is it not possible for the Post Office to put forward a proper cost-benefit analysis of what it is proposing as regards closures so that the consultation is genuine?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c961 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Closures Post offices Post Office
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk