Proceeding contribution from Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 19 March 2008. It occurred during Opposition day on Post Office Closures.
Post Office Closures
I am following the case that my hon. Friend is making, particularly in respect of the costs to the Government. It seems to me that one cost to the Treasury and the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has not been estimated at all—the cost of the closure of other parts of businesses that ineluctably fail as well when the Post Office is removed. I refer to associated VAT costs, for example, which is direct revenue lost to the Government. Following a sham consultation, four post offices in my constituency were closed despite a massive protest and more than 1,000 people signing a petition. Does my hon. Friend agree that this so-called consultation has been a fraudulent exercise?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 473 c979-80
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Closures Post offices Post Office
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:59:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457007
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457007
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457007