Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 March 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2008.


Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2008

Listening to the Minister reminds me of what a vexed local question planning invariably is. There is no getting away from that. Equally, there is no getting away from the vexed problem that all local authorities have when dealing with their budgets in total, of which, for planning authorities, planning runs away with a considerable amount of cost. No one can object to the principle that the cost of planning ought largely to be borne by those who are undertaking development. It was good to hear that what you might call the household proposals are to be protected by a lower level of increase in fee. Having said that, a better way to protect them would be to take the very small applications out of the playing field altogether, and I know that in various places there are some moves in that direction. Apart from that, the proposals are not wholly unreasonable in the circumstances. I have no reason to oppose them, and the Minister can go away happy that this is a part of an updating of the financial situation that we do not have any difficulty with.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c98GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Administration Fees and charges Planning authorities Planning permission Standards
Legislation
Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk