Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Mullin (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on Standards and Privileges.


Standards and Privileges

I rise to speak in support of the motion. I am a member of the Standards and Privileges Committee, which is so ably chaired by the right hon. Member for North-West Hampshire (Sir George Young). I wish to make only two or three small points. First, transparency, however painful, is an essential ingredient of a modern democracy, and we should not enter into arrangements in the employment of staff, or in any other respect, that cannot be defended publicly. Secondly, the right hon. Gentleman referred to timing, and I believe that the Committee was right to resist calls for delay. Action was urgently required in the wake of recent events. We in this House have to get ahead of public opinion, and not be continually dragged along behind it. Thirdly, and perhaps slightly more controversially, we have only ourselves to blame for the situation in which we find ourselves with regard to public opinion. It is true that much of the media reporting on our allowances is mendacious, but for far too long we have tolerated arrangements that do not exist anywhere else in the public or private sector. I recall that on one day in 2001 we voted down the Senior Salaries Review Body's recommendations on pensions and additional costs and substituted more generous arrangements. Sooner or later there was bound to be a public backlash.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c384-5 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Allowances Employment Families Ethics Members Members' staff
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk