Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 31 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for clarifying those issues. It might help if he were prepared to write to those who have taken part in the debate, to separate the possible government support that Eurostar gets from using the Channel Tunnel, because of the fixed costs that he mentioned—they are different on the French side—from the costs associated with using the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. I was getting a bit confused, so I am sure that it would be better if he wrote to us.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 700 c795
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Channel tunnel Competition High Speed 1 line Finance EU law Government assistance High speed trains Railway network Network Rail Regulation Eurostar London and Continental Railways Office of Rail Regulation
- Legislation
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:14:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_459306
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_459306
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_459306