Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Amess (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 April 2008. It occurred during Topical debate on Drug Strategy.


Drug Strategy

I enjoyed listening to the speeches of the hon. Members for Bolton, South-East (Dr. Iddon) and for Newport, West (Paul Flynn), and I shall re-read them to absorb further what they had to say. I have not previously heard the hon. Member for Bolton, South-East speak on the specific issues before us, although I have heard the hon. Member for Newport, West discuss them. He and I worked together on issues concerning arthritis, so we will not fall out on cannabis. However, I will just say to both those hon. Members that I fundamentally disagree with their views on cannabis. We have a good and competent Minister, and I listened carefully to his comments. I wish him well, but he has a tough battle ahead. In my early years in the House, when I represented a different constituency, a constituent called Leah Betts died as a result of ecstasy; her father later became an advisor to the Government. A satirical programme managed to gain admittance to this House and interviewed me about a drug called ““cake””. Lord Newton of Braintree had the Minister's job at the time. His officials answered the questions we tabled on ““cake””; we as Members of Parliament did not know whether ““cake”” was a slang term. I am hardly a superstar, but even nowadays sometimes when I walk along a street a very young person will run up to me who has seen that bit of television footage—it is shown over and again. What I usually say to them is, ““Okay, you thought it was funny, but did it actually put you off taking drugs?”” Obviously, the parents of Leah Betts were not particularly pleased at the trivialisation of the matter. On cannabis, I say to the hon. Members for Bolton, South-East and for Newport, West, ““Forget the classification.”” I was a Member in 2003 when we voted on the matter. Eleven Labour Members voted against. The current Prime Minister thought that we should change the classification. It is not about the classification; it is about the impression it gave to young people, which was absolutely wrong. Why did we not listen to Marjorie Wallace of SANE, who really does know what she is talking about? I am not about to tell the Minister that locking such youngsters up in prison will provide a solution. What my hon. Friend the Member for Shipley (Philip Davies) said was right. I do not understand why our prisons are awash with drugs—perhaps I am being naïve—but they are. I wish the Minister a fair wind in trying to deal with that as part of his strategy. It is a terrible situation. The psychotic effect of cannabis is absolutely proven. I wish the Government had listened then to the advice of the International Narcotics Control Board. This week, senior police officers have said that changing the classification was not a good idea. Where were they in 2003 and 2004? Were their words not reported? Also, why was the current Prime Minister not against the reclassification? I understand the point that the hon. Member for Bolton, South-East made, but we should think about the impression that it gave. All Members have constituents who come along to their surgeries and tell them about the devastating consequences of cannabis on the lives of young people.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c955 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Abuse Enforcement Drugs Medical treatments Misuse
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk