Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
My Lords, will the noble Baroness address my point about the Health and Social Care Bill, which is going through this House at the moment? It legislates for precisely what I suggest: the regulator should be able to offer a penalty that the citizen, whether business or individual, can accept. If it is accepted, it is a civil penalty—an administrative penalty—which does not involve a criminal conviction, but the citizen continues to have the right to say, ““No, I won’t accept this. I want to be taken to a court and have the matter proved against me ab initio””. The Government’s policy is to do that in that area and in relation to alcohol, as the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee suggested. That is reasonable and proportionate and fulfils what the noble Baroness said, which was that we do not want to criminalise everything. Why not go away and think carefully about doing that here?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 701 c33-4
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Business Fines Local government Standards Tribunals Regulation Local Better Regulation Office Stop notices
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:57:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_467435
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_467435
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_467435