Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 May 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Categories of Casino Regulations 2008.


Categories of Casino Regulations 2008

My Lords, I am grateful for help and advice from whichever quarter in the House it comes. It just tends to come more frequently from the Benches behind me and perhaps more pertinently. Inevitably with this debate, it went wider than the two issues in the order and regulations. I want to suggest to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, that in our discussions with the British Casino Association it is exactly the issues he has raised which need to be considered further. Ministers are exercised about these matters because the representations have been made and we are aware of the points that have been made in this debate. With regard to the question of whether a 17th can be added to the 16th the answer is no. The order names the successful authorities. If there were a question at all of one being substituted for another we would have to bring a new order before the House. There is no more an easy sleight of hand with regard to this order than there was any suggestion that one could easily substitute Manchester for Blackpool in the previous order; and look where that left us. On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c1202 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Advertising Closures Coastal areas Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Internet Foreign companies Location Standards Regulation Taxation Urban areas Regeneration Social problems Blackpool
Legislation
Categories of Casino Regulations 2008
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Large and Small Casino Premises Licences) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk