Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.


Housing and Regeneration Bill

We had better not pursue this arithmetic question much further. I simply thought that I could not let it pass, but I did not want to make a point of it. It will all be there in Hansard. What I wanted to get on the record was that times have moved on, and the question of shared equity in housing now provides a greater degree of flexibility than what was originally almost an apartheid system of private sector and social housing—I do not like to use the term ““council housing”” any more. They were two sides of a coin and never met. Now we have a much more flexible arrangement, which is wholly to the good.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c472GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Children Children in care Disadvantaged Community development Construction Building regulations Housing estates Poverty Older people Prices Owner occupation Private rented housing Standards Young people Social rented housing Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency
Legislation
Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk