Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
We had better not pursue this arithmetic question much further. I simply thought that I could not let it pass, but I did not want to make a point of it. It will all be there in Hansard. What I wanted to get on the record was that times have moved on, and the question of shared equity in housing now provides a greater degree of flexibility than what was originally almost an apartheid system of private sector and social housing—I do not like to use the term ““council housing”” any more. They were two sides of a coin and never met. Now we have a much more flexible arrangement, which is wholly to the good.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 701 c472GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Disability Children Children in care Disadvantaged Community development Construction Building regulations Housing estates Poverty Older people Prices Owner occupation Private rented housing Standards Young people Social rented housing Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:29:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474019
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474019
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474019