Proceeding contribution from Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the noble Baroness, and I apologise for interrupting those very detailed comments. If, as she appears to be arguing, we are going to, in effect, deny the other place the opportunity to look at this issue again, we need to be absolutely clear about what she is proposing. The proposal makes an exception. It says that where an earlier opt-in decision is necessary, those rules will not apply. In fact, it will be in the Government’s gift to say, ““I am sorry, we have overridden that particular opt-in opportunity””. Does that fit in with the detail of the timetable that she is talking about?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c397
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Courts Human rights EU law European Union Parliamentary scrutiny Monarchy Sovereignty Treaties Security UK membership of EU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union European Court of Justice Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:12:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_479583
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_479583
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_479583