Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.


European Union (Amendment) Bill

They are coming to an end, my Lords. I thank the Minister for his prompt. Regarding the Rasmussen case, Denmark’s top constitutional court said, "““Danish courts must rule that an E.C. act is inapplicable in Denmark if the extraordinary situations arise that with the required certainty it can be established that an E.C. act which has been upheld by the European Court of Justice is based on an application of the Treaty which lies beyond the surrender of sovereignty according to the Act of Accession. Similar interpretations apply with regard to Community law rules and legal principles which are based on the practice of the European Court of Justice””.—[Official Report, 14/5/08; col. 1095.]" That is the Danish court saying that it will review. I think I might be allowed to say something about Poland because I was cut short on the last occasion, unless the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton, is unwilling to permit that. The source is quite interesting. All this material is elementary; it is in a student textbook by Professor Trevor Hartley, who is a professor of international—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c416 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Courts Human rights EU law European Union Parliamentary scrutiny Monarchy Sovereignty Treaties Security UK membership of EU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union European Court of Justice Treaty of Lisbon
Legislation
European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk