Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from John Penrose (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 June 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Deprivation/Child Poverty.


Deprivation/Child Poverty

I agree with large parts of the Freud report. The hon. Gentleman is right to say that Freud recommends introducing far more variety of supply into the welfare-to-work arena so that more organisations, particular those in the third and charitable sectors, can get involved in getting people in hard-to-reach groups back to work. Also, we must ensure that organisations are paid by results over an extended period. It is not enough to give someone a couple of brief courses, get them into a job and then wash our hands of them. We must ensure that the job is sustainable and that the person remains in work for an appreciable period. In a previous report, the Committee recommended that the person should be in work for at least a year before the welfare-to-work agency receives full payment. That would help to ensure that the problems mentioned by the hon. Gentleman are avoided.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c316WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Children Disadvantaged Families Low incomes Poverty Personal budgets
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk