Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Cox (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 June 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Witness Anonymity.
Witness Anonymity
As I am sure the Secretary of State will agree, it is important to recognise that all those accused in our courts are innocent until they are proven guilty. One of the most effective tools for the uncovering of an unjust allegation is cross-examination, but that can be emasculated if the defendant does not know who his accuser is. However, I welcome the approach that the Government are taking, and provided that the measures taken are ““careful and proportionate””, in the words of the Law Lords, I am sure that my colleagues and I will support whatever the Government propose. Will the Secretary of State clarify two points? First, to what categories of case will the new provisions apply, and how will they be defined? Secondly, will the Secretary of State give consideration, at least, to applying the new provisions to defence witnesses? There are cases in which defence witnesses can experience the same types of intimidatory pressure as prosecution witnesses, especially if the defence run is one that is in conflict with that of a co-defendant.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 478 c524
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Appeals Convictions Common law European Convention on Human Rights House of Lords Intimidation Legislation Judgements Protection Witnesses Trials
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:07:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487274
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487274
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487274