Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Criminal Justice: Witness Anonymity.
Criminal Justice: Witness Anonymity
My Lords, I support all the points made by noble Lords who have asked questions in this short debate, in particular the points made by the noble and learned Lords, Lord Lloyd and Lord Mayhew. Does the Minister agree that the extremely thorough speeches of the Law Lords in this case have shown that overuse of anonymity is in fundamental conflict with the common law rights of defendants and that it cannot possibly be regarded as a technicality? Does he further agree that the thorough speech of the noble Lord, Lord Mance, on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights shows that a trial where the sole or decisive evidence is given by anonymous witnesses is prima facie not a fair trial, and that only in the most exceptional circumstances would it be possible to justify a conviction in such cases?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c1606
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Appeals Convictions Common law European Convention on Human Rights House of Lords Intimidation Legislation Judgements Protection Witnesses Trials
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:56:52 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487529
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487529
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487529