Proceeding contribution from Chris Mullin (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 July 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007.
Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007
The Minister has outlined a theory. Further south, that theory may be justified. Perhaps there is a market for the surplus property that will be forced on to the market. In large parts of the country, however, especially in the area that I represent, there is no market for that property. Some of it has been on the market for years. Earlier, I mentioned the site owned by the printing works. The company has been trying to sell it for three years, but has had no takers. At that point, the theory breaks down, does it not?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 478 c397WH
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Empty property Exemptions Economic situation Business rates
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:42:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490924
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490924
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490924