Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Listing Buildings.
Listing Buildings
Is it better to have half a cake or no cake at all? That question is at the heart of the argument presented by my hon. Friend the Member for Stockport (Ann Coffey). We have all seen the television programme in which one wonderful building is chosen from each region and then the whole nation votes—that shows how popular this subject is—on which should be preserved. As a result, the other 10 or 11 buildings, or however many of them there are, are left at risk of falling down. The programme shows the state of all the buildings, and how urgent it is to find the money to restore them. However, despite all the publicity and national effort, only one of the wonderful buildings shown in each series can be preserved. How many buildings are simply falling down for lack of money? Might not some other approach—perhaps a lessening of the restrictions—be appropriate? That might allow us to succeed in preserving something of a building, even if not the whole thing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 479 c227-8
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assessments Cultural heritage Historic buildings English Heritage Listed buildings Regeneration
- Legislation
- Draft Heritage Protection Bill
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:44:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492853
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492853
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492853