Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords].
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords]
I understand the dilemma involving the voluntary and the non-voluntary option, but is not one argument for a compulsory option that we would have much more certainty about the funding over the medium and long terms? Bluntly, it will be difficult to achieve predictability with a voluntary scheme.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 480 c67
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Finance Liability Investment Insolvency Young people Wills Big Lottery Fund Balance Charitable Foundation for Unclaimed Assets National Savings and Investments
- Legislation
- Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:22:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497213
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497213
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497213