Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Duddridge (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords].


Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords]

I now understand what my hon. Friend is saying. He is not trying to say that it is not the Big Lottery Fund or a little lottery fund—it is simply a diminishing lottery fund. I have now got the point. As for the issue of taking the money out of the banks, the Government have missed a trick. The old-fashioned bank manager who knew the local community could be an asset for the Government because, rather than investing in normal loans for commercial profit, such banks could be allowed to retain some of that money and to lend either to social enterprise as part of their community support function, and follow that enterprise through or, indeed, go down the line of microcredit to pump-prime capital for microfinance and microcredit in the UK—a system that has been successful in developing countries elsewhere. Finally, I should like to probe the Minister further about the differential treatment of dormant bank accounts. There is clearly a major difference between accounts that have £5, £50 or £50,000 in them, yet by my reading of it, the Bill deals with such accounts in very similar ways. I am not entirely sure that that is appropriate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
480 c92-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Charities Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Finance Liability Investment Insolvency Young people Wills Big Lottery Fund Balance Charitable Foundation for Unclaimed Assets National Savings and Investments
Legislation
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk