Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Pat McFadden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 October 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on British Business (China).


British Business (China)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that most important intervention. I am glad that he made it. Of course, it is important that visits are backed up by results. Our exports to China have increased significantly in recent months. Reference has been made to the new Secretary of State, Lord Mandelson. He will be an important addition to our armoury when increasing business and trade opportunities. Few people in the world have his experience of China, and many countries would like someone with experience as a Trade Commissioner to join their Government in order to champion that policy. The question was raised of whether our representation in China is right. We have the embassy; and we have three consulates that operate each in their own area. The point has been made that we have too many offices—and that we have too few. The point has been made that local offices for the regions clutter the process—and that local offices are valuable in providing links to the local area. We must make up our minds on whether we want more or less and whether we want local or national. We are right to seek value for money. A review by Arthur D. Little and others made certain recommendations, which we shall put into practice, to ensure that the taxpayer gets the best value for money from our important trade representations in China. I would like to say more, but time does not permit me to do so. The issue is hugely important, and as a Government we do get it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
480 c278WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Business China Overseas investment Trade
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk