Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, I would be surprised if most of the points of the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, were not covered by Section 146(1) of the 2004 Act: "““Regulations may provide that where the Board is satisfied that an eligible scheme was not such a scheme throughout such period as may be prescribed, the Board must refuse to assume responsibility for the scheme under this Chapter””." That would clearly cover the point in part. I also note that there is a debate on the economy, to which the Minister will no doubt—no, perhaps he will not be contributing to that debate on Monday. I am sure that regulation by the FSA will figure somewhat strongly in it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c1439
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Assets Banks Contributions Financial services Financial institutions Workplace pensions Pensions Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Pension rights Pensions Regulator
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:47:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503491
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503491
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503491