Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Manchester City Council Bill [Lords].


Manchester City Council Bill [Lords] (By Order)

The hon. Gentleman is under a misapprehension if he thinks that I am standing in the way of anything. What I am trying to do is ensure that we have a rational debate. I do not know the extent of the hon. Gentleman's reading on the subject, but if he reads a bit more he will find that some of the local authorities that are campaigning for the measures in the Bills and asking for a wider application of legislative measures would regard certain charitable activities as themselves offensive and in need of further regulation. In due course, I may be able to draw the hon. Gentleman's attention to specific evidence with which I can support that proposition. Therefore, let him not think that charities are at present the victim of the pedlar, and that they can only benefit from the activities of these councils if the Bills are enacted. The councils' agenda is to reduce some of the charitable activities. In our previous debate, almost all the talk was to do with equating pedlars with rogue traders. After dealing with the Durham issue, I shall try to rebalance that by giving an example of a genuine pedlar who is doing great work in raising money for charity, which, if these Bills were implemented, he would no longer be able to do.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
481 c963 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Greater Manchester Manchester City Council Street trading
Legislation
Manchester City Council Bill (HL) 2006-07 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk