Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Rail Vehicle Accessibility Exemption Orders (Parliamentary Procedures) Regulations 2008.


Rail Vehicle Accessibility Exemption Orders (Parliamentary Procedures) Regulations 2008

I am grateful to the Minister for explaining the purpose of his orders. This is the first debate I have had with him, but I have had a good report from my noble friend Lady Morris of Bolton who says that he is very good to do business with, so I look forward to doing business with him over many years. I debated a similar order with the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, before the Summer Recess. At the time I said it was right that we have a relatively high hurdle of parliamentary procedures if it is desired to exempt or deviate certain vehicles from the requirements of the DDA, and I maintain that position. The parliamentary procedures regulations appear to have appropriate safeguards. They are not too widely drafted but the hurdle still remains, and in the unlikely event of disabled groups becoming aggrieved with any further orders, your Lordships still have a well-equipped parliamentary toolbox—and some of the tools are still quite sharp. Fortunately, no person has found it necessary to brief me about these regulations and consequently I am happy to support them.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c26GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Construction Greater London Exemptions Railways Parliamentary procedure Trains Rolling stock Victoria line Statutory instruments
Legislation
Rail Vehicle Accessibility (London Underground Victoria Line 09TS Vehicles) Exemption Order 2008
Rail Vehicle Accessibility Exemption Orders (Parliamentary Procedures) Regulations 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk