Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

My Lords, I have not been a regular attender during the passage of this Bill and, until last Sunday, I had no idea of the problems that a minority will face when this measure goes through. It would be churlish not to recognise the sterling work of those who pursued this matter for so long and, in particular, my noble friend Lady Hollis. However, I draw the House’s attention to an anomaly. Some of your Lordships may have read about it in the Daily Mail; my noble friend has just mentioned that it has been supportive. The Daily Mail published a report on Monday about Felicity Hammerton, who falls outside the 6 April deadline and will not be able to get the full benefit. At this very late stage—although I know that I cannot change anything—in his consideration of further details, will the Minister not lose sight of the fact that there is a need to go further? I understand about affordability and that there are difficulties, but I also understand the plight of women such as Felicity Hammerton who, through no fault of their own, fall outside the advantage that has been given to the large number of women to which my noble friend Lady Hollis referred. My plea, as much as I can muster any plea at all, is that that is not lost sight of and that, if it becomes affordable and if things change, it will be revisited with a view to extending the potential beneficiaries in the way I described.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1591 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Companies Assets Costs Contributions Women Insolvency Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Pension rights State retirement pensions Pensions Regulator
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk