Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ed Balls (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 20 November 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Safeguarding Children.


Safeguarding Children

We have discussed that issue with the hon. Gentleman many times, and we see no evidence for what he says. It would be quite wrong to distort judgments made about child safety for revenue or financial reasons. More generally, I find it quite hard to understand this concept of the ““wrong”” children being taken into care when other children should have been instead. As far as I am concerned, if a child's safety is at risk and the thresholds are passed, the child should go into care—but only in such cases. In this case, it is clear that the home environment was chaotic and the family concerned did not take its responsibilities seriously in any way, but the idea that that is the only kind of family in which children are at risk or subject to abuse is completely wrong. I am afraid that in every area, at every level of income and in every walk of life, children are, at times, abused and maltreated, sometimes without that abuse having come to the attention of the authorities. Where there is evidence of abuse, action should be taken, whether they are the right or wrong kind of child in the hon. Gentleman's view.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
483 c388 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Abuse Inspections HM Inspectorate of Constabulary Infanticide Protection Offences against children Social services Healthcare Commission Haringey Local safeguarding children boards Ofsted
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk