Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lilley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 December 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Benefits Uprating.


Benefits Uprating

As the Minister knows, I fully support in principle the welfare reforms that his right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced yesterday and to which he himself has referred today, but on the assumption that they would save money rather than cost money. Can he clarify that point? Outside the House, he and his colleagues have suggested that the reforms will, on balance, save the taxpayer money, but in the House yesterday the Secretary of State said that the reckless borrowing in the pre-Budget report—he was quoting a Conservative Member—was necessary because"““it allocated an extra £1 billion and this White Paper allocates still further money.””—[Official Report, 10 December 2008; Vol.485, c. 541.]" The Minister said today that that further money would amount to £1.3 billion. Will he tell us whether the programme will cost money and require extra borrowing, or save money and reduce the borrowing and the cost to the taxpayer?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
485 c700 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Economic situation Incapacity benefit Pensioners Social security benefits State retirement pensions Tax allowances Uprating Winter fuel payment Retail prices index
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk