Proceeding contribution from Fiona Mactaggart (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 December 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Sutherland Inquiry.
Sutherland Inquiry
The Secretary of State said in his statement that Lord Sutherland concluded that the procurement procedure was sound, yet it is clear from the report that although the procedure underwent two OGC gateway reviews as well as the expensive involvement of PricewaterhouseCoopers, the procedure did not produce good value for money for the taxpayer. Is there not an issue about the entire procurement? What steps will my right hon. Friend take to ensure that the Government learn the lesson from this procurement exercise and ensure that we put more emphasis on good value for the taxpayer in the future? What action will he take to ensure that pupils, schools and markers feel confident in next year's tests?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 485 c1002
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assessments Inquiries National curriculum tests Standards Schools Delivery of National Curriculum Tests in 2008 Inquiry
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:42:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_515530
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_515530
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_515530