Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]
We have one amendment in this group—Amendment 106—and it is very simple. I think that we have already raised the issue of a petition organiser monopolising a petition. Rather than revolving around one person, a petition should involve a group of people who want a grievance or problem to be resolved. Rather than a letter of acknowledgement, we would prefer to see a simpler form of communication acknowledging the petition. Therefore, we are opposed to the possibility of one person promoting something rather than it being a genuine petition.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 707 c111GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Children in care Accountability Councillors County councils ICT Internet District councils Local government Public consultation Young people Local strategic partnerships Local area agreements
- Legislation
- Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:40:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523772
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523772
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523772