Proceeding contribution from Stephen Ladyman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. His answer to my question might mean that I will not need to make a further contribution to the debate on this group of amendments. One possible effect of the hon. Gentleman’s amendment is that it might be used to exclude small friendly savings providers, such as credit unions, as they do not have the wider access to other banking services that the amendment seems to require. It might also prevent the Government from targeting these accounts through Post Office Counters—something that might help to keep some of the post offices in all our constituencies open. I hope that that is not the intention, but will the hon. Gentleman confirm that it is simply a probing amendment and that he does not intend to limit these accounts to the big banks. If that is his intention, I will certainly want to vote against it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 488 c300
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Bank services Credit unions Carers' benefits Eligibility Financial services Financial institutions Interest rates Personal savings Low incomes Social security benefits Saving gateway
- Legislation
- Saving Gateway Accounts Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:53:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483