Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
On the back of this, will the Minister say what the budgetary allowance is for the revision at three years? The size and extent of the consultation and the revision will determine its costing. If a small budget is allocated to do it, one risks having a tokenistic review, whereas if it is revised less frequently but is more extensive, the revision may prove to be more cost-effective in the long term.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c154GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Accountability Administration Health services Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Patients Public consultation Primary care trusts National Institute for Health and Care Excellence MRSA Standards Safety Care Quality Commission National Quality Board
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:56:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531890
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531890
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531890